Refuting Creationism
onsdag 28 oktober 2009
Uppdaterat länklistan med Refuting Creationism.
"Refuting Creationism is a blog dedicated to exposing creationist fallacies about science and highlighting the destructive effects of religious fanaticism on our world."
"Refuting Creationism is a blog dedicated to exposing creationist fallacies about science and highlighting the destructive effects of religious fanaticism on our world."
Vinnaren av årets Golden Crocoduck
Ny artikel
fredag 23 oktober 2009
Omröstningen har börjat! Golden Crocoduck 2009
fredag 9 oktober 2009
Nu börjar omröstningen för Golden Crocoduck 2009, alltså utmärkelsen som går till den mest korkade kreationisten! Här finns utlåtandet från Potholer54debunks, och om du vill gå direkt till omröstningssidan, är adressen http://www.potholer.co.uk/. Lycka till!
Det äldsta kapitlet i människans historia
torsdag 1 oktober 2009
En 4,4 miljoner år gammal humanoid tar oss längre tillbaka än någonsin tidigare på släktträdet, mycket nära den den tid vi separerade från schimpansen. ScienceNow (som har en videopresentation av fyndet) skriver:
Läs artikeln om Ardipithecus ramidus här. Lägg namnet Ardi på minnet.
Researchers have unveiled the oldest known skeleton of a putative human ancestor--and it is full of surprises. Although the creature, named Ardipithecus ramidus, had a brain and body the size of a chimpanzee, it did not knuckle-walk or swing through the trees like an ape. Instead, "Ardi" walked upright, with a big, stiff foot and short, wide pelvis, researchers report in Science. "We thought Lucy was the find of the century," says paleoanthropologist Andrew Hill of Yale University, referring to the famous 3.2-million-year-old skeleton that revolutionized thinking about human origins. "But in retrospect, it was not."
Läs artikeln om Ardipithecus ramidus här. Lägg namnet Ardi på minnet.
Prenumerera på Inlägg [Atom]
Citat:
[ID] is not a scientific argument at all, but a religious one. It might be worth discussing in a class on the history of ideas, in a philosophy class on popular logical fallacies, or in a comparative religion class on origin myths from around the world. But it no more belongs in a biology class than alchemy belongs in a chemistry class, phlogiston in a physics class or the stork theory in a sex education class. In those cases, the demand for equal time for 'both theories' would be ludicrous. Similarly, in a class on 20th-century European history, who would demand equal time for the theory that the Holocaust never happened?Richard Dawkins
Om denna sida:
Evolutionsteori.se drivs av Anders Hesselbom och Johan Karlsson
